top of page


The minor isn't eligible to enter into a partnership. Although, with authorization from all the adult partners, he is also admitted to the benefits of partnership. Any partnership agreement involving a minor can't be thought to be valid for the purpose of registration. A minor is someone a United Nations agency is nonetheless to attain a bigger half under the law that he's dependent upon.

The law that has to be adhered to whereas determining whether or not a person is a minor or not is the Indian Majority Act, 1875. Section three of the same act classifies eighteen because the age at which a person in an Asian country is taken into account to have earned the age of majority. A minor is eligible for the benefits of a partnership if he or she has Indian status, is of sound mind at the time of entering the partnership, is not barred from entering into a partnership by any law, and is consented to by all partners before entering into that partnership.

Child of a deceased partner sharing profits. Typically, on the death of a partner, the widow or the kid of the deceased partner is also given a share of profits in accordance with an associate agreement which can be entered into between the partners. Such a widow or kid doesn't become a partner just because he or she is sharing the profits within the business.

Shri Brojendra Lal Mitter, Man Dinshah Fardunji Mullah, Man Alladi Krishnaswami Iyer, and Mr. Arthur Eggar were members of a special committee that was concerned with drafting the partnership act. They mentioned the topic of partnership terribly fastidiously and took inspiration from the English partnership act and judicial precedents involving this subject each in India and England.

While planning the order of the Indian partnership act, they saw that they didn’t have a suitable motivation to exempt the act from the general norm with regard to coping with minors in legal agreements established by contract law expressed in Section 11 and therefore the judgement of the Privy Council in Mohori Bibi’s case. Additionally, they ascertained that it had been a standard practise in India since 1866 to create minors eligible for the benefits of a contract. Given these perceptions, the committee decided not to allow minors to be a part of the partnership because a partnership is the result of an agreement that a minor is unable to participate in as a party, however a minor may reap the benefits of a partnership.

A minor, even if represented by a guardian, cannot become a full-fledged partner in a partnership firm.In C.I.T Mysore v. Shah Mohandas Sadhuram, it absolutely was commanded that if the partnership agreement prevents the minor from changing into an official partner of the corporation and solely grants the minor advantages to such a partnership, it can't be declared invalid simply because the minor’s guardian claims to act on behalf of the minor before signing the contract till and unless the partnership agreement violates the provisions mentioned under article 30 of the Indian Partnership Act.


Section four of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, defines "partnership" as under:

"Partnership" is the relationship between persons who have united to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all. The Calcutta high court explained the term "partnership" within the Registrar of corporations, Societies and Non-commercialism Corporation, West Bengal & another v. Tarun Manna & others, and in keeping with the Court, the partnership is the relation between persons created by a contract whereby the parties to such a contract have united to share the profits of a business with the additional condition that the projected business should be administrated by all or any of them acting for all. Therefore, the primary condition of the existence of a partnership is that there should be an agreement by the partners to share the profits of a business. The other condition is that such business should be agreed to be carried on by all or any of them acting for all. In other words, there should be an agency among the partners of the projected business as specifically recognised in Section eighteen of the Act.

The Essentials of Partnership

According to Section four, the subsequent necessities are necessary to represent a "partnership".

  • There ought to be an agreement between the need to be partners.

  • The purpose of making a partnership ought to be to carry on business.

  • The motive for the creation of a partnership ought to be to earn and share profits.

  • The business of the firm ought to be carried on by them or any of them acting for all, i.e., in mutual agency.

When all the above elements are present during a certain relationship, that's referred to as a "partnership". People who have entered into partnership with each other are referred to as "partners" and "a firm" and, therefore, the name beneath which their necessities of business are carried on is called the "firm name".

There is no bar to the widow or the son of a deceased partner from entering into a partnership after the death of the deceased, but a transparent agreement to that effect has to be evidenced.


An "agent" may be a person used to try to do any act for another or to represent another in dealing with a third party. The person for whom such an act is finished, or who is therefore depicted, is named the "principal".

Different kinds of agents


An auctioneer is an agent whose business is to sell products or different property by public auction, i.e., by open sale. He is a mercantile agent within the meaning of the sales of goods act.


A factor is a mercantile agent who is entrusted with the custody of products for the purpose of sale. He has the power to sell products on credit and also to induce the amount from the customer.


A broker is an agent who has the authority to barter the sale of property on behalf of a principal with a third party. Unlike other factors, he himself has no possession of the products. He gets his commission whenever any deal materialises through his efforts.

Del Credere Agents:

Usually, an agent isn't answerable to his principle for the failure of the third party to perform the contract. A deceptive agent constitutes an exception to the current rule. He's a mercantile commission and guarantees the performance of the contract by the third person.

Who could be a minor?

A minor may be someone who doesn't have some legal rights at a specific age. Minors don't have the full legal capability that adults have. Generally, minors aren't granted the legal rights of adults till they reach the majority age. As a result, the majority age is considered to be anyone at the age of eighteen. This is because, before the age of eighteen years, the minors or kids are still developing by their nature, health, knowledge, etc. Once minors develop physically and mentally and cross the age of eighteen, they're thought of as mature people. They’re considered adults because they're capable of handling similar legal rights and duties as mature adults.

They'll provide a vote, or they need the right to present a vote, they need the right to sue and own property, and they're capable of contract. However, maturity isn't forever based on age. In some cases, the minor has enough maturity and understanding of nature and the major doesn’t. Each kid is totally different in their approach. The kid or minor also needed some basic needs. Each kid is entitled to similar treatment; no discrimination on the grounds of sex, race, caste, incapacity, or faith. There’s a different provision within the position of the minors.

In Holme v. Hammond, five people entered into a partnership for seven years and agreed to share the profits and losses equally. They further agreed that if anybody died before the end of the aforesaid amount of seven years, the others would continue the business and therefore the share of the profits of the deceased would go to the executors. On the death of one of the partners, the survivors continued the business. The executors of the deceased, who didn't truly take any part in the management of the business, were paid a 1/5th share of profits created since the death of the deceased. The litigator sued the executors of the deceased to make them liable in respect of a contract entered into by the living partners upon the death of the deceased partner. It had been held that the executors, though sharing the profits, had not become partners and, therefore, they might not be made liable.

In the St. Xavier's faculty case, the Supreme Court has justly observed, "The whole object of conferring the right on the minorities underneath Article thirty is to confirm that there'll be equality between the majority and the minority." If the minorities don't have such special protection, they're going to be denied equality. "


A minor will be brought into an existing partnership and cannot form a brand new partnership. In furtherance of a similar to safeguard the rights of minors, the role of the minor is solely within the nature of a beneficiary, so a minor is barely admitted to the advantages of the partnership. The legislative intent is to safeguard a minor, being unable to establish risk, liability, and his responsibility, from all styles of liability, so a minor is barely allowed to take the profits and alternative advantages of a firm going out of business.

In CIT v. Dwarkadas & Co., the Hon’ble Apex Court commanded as follows:

"Section thirty of the Indian Partnership Act clearly lays down that a minor cannot become a partner, though, with the consent of the adult partners, he could also be admitted to the advantages of a partnership." Any document which fits beyond this section can't be considered valid for the aim of registration. "


  1. right to access and assess copies of the books of accounts of the firm.

  2. right to his agreed shares of the profits and assets.

Furthermore, it's been declared that the minor has no right to access other books that aren't associated with the accounts of the firm.

  1. After reaching the age of majority, the minor may decide whether or not to become a partner at 6-month intervals.If he/she decides to become a partner, then he/she is entitled to the share that he/she was antecedently entitled to as a minor.


Section thirty of the Indian Partnership Act controls the admission of a minor into the partnership. This section covers the rights and responsibilities of a minor who joins the partnership. A better examination of the provision, specifically section 30(1), reveals that a minor can't be accepted into the partnership as a full-fledged partner, but is licenced to avail the partnership’s advantages with the approval of the other partners.

The Apex Court declared in CIT v. Dwarkadas Khetan & Co. that minors in an established firm shouldn't become qualified partners. The Indian Partnership Act’s concession is that a minor is allowed to avail himself of the profits of an existing business under section thirty. It has been decided that the inner revenue service cannot register a partnership in which a minor may be a partner to the extent that he's personally in control of losses and has the facility to vote and participate within the company.

In the critical decision of Commissioner of Income Tax versus D. Khaitan and Co., the Calcutta HC held that if a minor is declared a full-fledged partner in a firm, that partnership firm can't be registered with the income tax Department. If the partnership has to be registered with the government agency, an entire new contract should be written, with minors admitted completely to the firm’s advantages, and therefore, the previous contract is invalidated once the new contract is in result. It had been additionally declared that the new contract should expressly specify that the minor was allowed to join the partnership only with the aim of receiving blessings, and that the minor wasn't answerable for any losses.

In the case of Banka Mal Lajja Ram & Co. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi, the Punjab and Haryana high courts determined that even though all of the partners of the partnership firm comply with acknowledging the minor as a full-fledged partner, the choice can't be enforced. A juvenile or minor partner will sue the opposite partners of the firm for their advantages under Section 30(4) of the Indian Partnership Act, though this privilege isn't accessible to the full-fledged partners of the firm. The rule also specifies that if a minor breaks all relations with the corporation, his share should be valued in line with Section forty-eight of the Indian Partnership Act to the extent practicable. The Andhra Pradesh high court declared in Addepally Nageswara Rao and Bros v. CIT that: "In case if he (minor) contributes capital or is entitled to a share of the firm’s profits, the liability may be connected to the minor to that extent".

Service and apprenticeship positions in England

Under English law, a child is certain by the contract of apprenticeship or services as a result of such contracts being useful to him and facilitating him in earning his bread and butter. Contracts of apprenticeship stand on a similar footing because the contract for necessaries


It is concluded that though minors can't be recognised as complete partners in a firm, they'll, however, be entitled to receive profits arising out of such a partnership. Minors will solely enter into partnerships with existing firms, and the entry of a minor should be allowed with the consent of all partners. Minors have restricted rights and liabilities after they enter into partnerships.

This article is written by Shyam Gupta of IPEM Group of Institute.

Recent Posts

See All


Introduction The Constitution of India is a legal document that establishes a federal system of government for the nation as well as lays out specific duties for the federal and state governments. The


Introduction A person is liable for his own wrongful acts and does not incur any liability for the wrongful acts done by others . But, sometimes liability arises vicariously for the torts committed by


Post: Blog2 Post
Anchor 1
bottom of page