top of page



The purpose of a First Information Report (FIR) is to document information that is provided to the police. This information must be converted to a written report that will be credited with initiating the criminal law, regardless of whether it was obtained orally or in writing.

When a crime is cognizable, the police are free to make an arrest without a warrant and start an investigation. In contrast, the police are not free to take either of these actions in a non-cognizable case without the court's express consent. The CrPC's Sections 154 and 155, read in conjunction with Section 2, provide clarification of this viewpoint. An officer-in-charge of a police station must record the first information about a cognizable offense in the earliest form possible, known as a FIR (First Information Report). The police begin their investigation based on the first information report. The following definitions apply:

1. The police officer was provided this piece of information.

2. The information must be related to an offense that is cognizable.

3. It is a fact that was initially reported at the time.

4. The victim of the cognizable offence, or a representative acting on their behalf, provides information and files a police report.

The information provided to the police officer in order to register a case must be true and accurate. It shouldn't be gossip; it should be able to be linked back to the person who is in charge of disseminating the information. It might or might not be hearsay, but whomever reports it should accept responsibility for it and identify the information's source. Any person who has knowledge of the commission of a cognizable offense may file a FIR. The victim, a witness, and anybody else who knows of the commission of an offense are all covered by this authority, including the police officer. The primary goal of filing an F.I.R. is to initiate the criminal justice system. Additionally, it will help the police officer begin an investigation into the crime that was committed and gather all available evidence as soon as possible.

Some of the other objects of filing an FIR would be to notify the crime that was reported to the police station to the District Magistrate and the District Superintendent of Police, who are in charge of maintaining the district's safety and tranquilly, To notify the crime that was reported to the police station to the District Magistrate and the District Superintendent of Police, who are in charge of maintaining the district's safety and tranquilly and To defend the accused against any ensuing additions or variations.


Some of the essential conditions of an FIR are as follows:-

1) What details need to be communicated?

2) What capacity did the offense occur in?

3) Who was the criminal?

4) Who was the victim of the crime?

5) When did the crime start to occur?

6) Where was the crime committed?

7) What drove this decision?

8) How it happened, if at all.

9) If any, witnesses.

10) If something was removed?

11) What signs did the accused leave behind?

12) Any causality at all.

In Mani Mohan v. Emperor[1], it was established that the following are the essential conditions of a First Information Report:

1) It must contain some sort of information.

2) Writing is required. The concerned police officer should put the information, if provided in writing, into writing.

3) The primary act or crime should be cognizable in its own nature, not the following acts.

4) The F.I.R. must be in the form of a grievance or accusation with the intent to invoke the law.


Since the information obtained under Section 154 is referred to as a FIR, it is crucial to understand the rules governing the process for recording information in relation to incidents that are cognizable under Section 154.

If the information is provided verbally to a police officer in charge of a police station, that official is required to reduce it in writing. The informant should then read it over and sign it afterward. The state administration has authorized a book in which the information thus obtained must be recorded. The informant must receive a free copy of the information that was recorded.

The aggrieved party may send the Superintendent of Police the substance of the information if the officer in charge refuses to record it. If the Superintendent of Police is satisfied that the cognizable offense has been committed, he or she will either conduct the investigation himself or instruct a subordinate police officer to do so.

In relation to the relevant offense, this police officer will have all the authority of an officer in command of the police station. Section 154's requirement that oral statements be reduced to paper and signed by the informant serves as a deterrent against making careless statements about criminal offenses by making the informant accountable for his statements. Section 180 of the Indian Penal Code imposes penalties for refusal by the informant to sign the initial information. However, it is not essential for the informant to have signed the first information report in order for it to be void and invalid. The initial data remains acceptable as evidence.

In other words, a FIR just serves as a complaint to initiate the processes of law and order; all the information can be acquired during the inquiry stage. The Madhya Pradesh High Court noted in one of its rulings that subsequent reports were written and were not covered by section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and could not be treated as such. The FIR is the report of the crime that convinces the police apparatus to begin an investigation.


An FIR can only contain information on a crime that is a cognizable offense. The information does not have to include all of the case's specifics. The name of the accused need not be mentioned as well. It is required that it reveal details about the commission of an offense that is cognizable in nature.

The following situations are exempt from being considered as an FIR:-

1) Information acquired after the investigation's commencement.

2) Telephonic information, unless it is provided by a known individual who admits his identity and the communication has all the necessary elements of an offence and is reduced to writing by S.H.O.

3) Information about a simple grouping of some people.

4) Unauthorized, vague, and illogical information


Anyone may submit a First Information Report (FIR). He does not necessarily have to be the injured party, the victim, or a witness. The source of the First Information Report need not be the person with firsthand knowledge of the events; it could just be hearsay.


The police station of the area in question under whose jurisdiction the offense occurred can receive a FIR.

In order to find the guilty party and bring them to justice, it is important to first learn more about the alleged criminal action. Its secondary but no less significant goal is to learn as soon as possible about an alleged criminal conduct and to document the circumstances before the trial in case they are forgotten.


First Information Report must always be filed promptly and without wasting any time. Such a report has the highest degree of credibility and is consistently welcomed and valued by the courts[3]. The Supreme Court ruled that it is important for the FIR to be filed as soon as possible, before there is a chance to tamper with or destroy the evidence. It takes away any potential for mistrust to arise.


We have already underlined the need for every FIR to be submitted as quickly, efficiently, and without wasting any time as is reasonably possible. There may be instances where a time extension for submitting the FIR is necessary.

However, under the compelling circumstances, there must be compelling justifications for a reasonable delay in filing the FIR. Judges with extensive knowledge and experience can exercise their discretion wisely and in each case's best interest of justice. However, as we have already stated, there is no time limit that can be set for applying the reasonableness test to the filing of a FIR. Each case's specific facts and circumstances will determine this. If the prosecution supported the factual challenges faced by the people filing the report, the delay in filing the FIR as such is not legally fatal.


An FIR is not a significant piece of evidence. That is, it cannot be taken into account as proof of the facts contained within.

However, the following uses of FIR are permitted:

1) FIR is admissible in support of an informant witness[4]. But it can't be used to refute or undermine the testimony of other witnesses.

2) FIR may be used to refute an informant witness[5].

3) The defense may use the FIR to challenge the credibility of the maker[6].

4) An accused may be found guilty of making a non-confessional FIR[7].

5) FIR may be used as substantive evidence in a deathbed declaration, if it is relevant to the events and circumstances that led to the informant's death[8] .


The goal of submitting an F.I.R. to the police as soon as feasible after an offense has been committed is to gather and receive new information about the circumstances and facts that are likely to have contributed to the offense.

If the FIR is taken and documented before the informant's memory deteriorates and before he begins to forget the facts, it will have more corroborative significance. In light of this, if there is a delay in lodging. If there is a FIR and there is an unjustified and unexplained delay, it may give rise to suspicion or the introduction of a made-up account by the prosecution. The prosecution must provide an explanation for the delay in filing the FIR. It retains its probative significance even after being adequately explained. However, the prosecut